House vs Flat: Which Is the Smarter Buy-to-Let Investment?

Good morning,

Imagine standing at the estate agent’s window. One listing shows a family home, the other a sleek city flat.

You’ve got £100k mortgage ready to invest, so which do you choose?

It feels like a small decision, but it shapes everything: your returns, your tenant base, even your long-term wealth.

This week in The Data Capital, I’ll break down the choice, run the numbers, and help you decide whether your next buy-to-let should be a house or a flat.

Let’s dive in.

This Week’s Biggest News…….

  1. Private rent and house prices, UK: August 2025
    Average UK monthly private rents increased by 5.9%, to £1,343, in the 12 months to July 2025 (provisional estimate); this annual growth rate is down from 6.7% in the 12 months to June 2025.

  2. Landlords could face tax on rental income in budget
    The government is apparently considering charging National Insurance on rental income – which they claim could raise £2 billion. This wouldn’t affect those who own within limited companies, but would surely add to the exodus of legacy landlords.

Want more like this? Join 1,000+ readers getting The Data Capital each week.

Should You Buy a House or a Flat as a Buy-to-Let Investor?

For every buy-to-let investor, one of the earliest and most important decisions is whether to buy a house or a flat.

On paper, both look appealing.

Both generate rental income. Both can grow in value.

But what ae the difference and as an investor what is the best strategy to follow?

Lets Start With Houses

Let’s start with houses. When you buy a house, you’re not just buying bricks and mortar—you’re buying the land it sits on.

And in the long run, it’s the land that appreciates most. This is why houses often outpace flats in terms of capital growth.

Houses also tend to attract families or long-term renters who want stability. That means fewer void periods, longer tenancies, and a tenant base that looks after the property as if it were their own.

You also hold the freehold, giving you more control without the ongoing burden of service charges or ground rent.

Of course, this comes with responsibilities—gardens don’t look after themselves, roofs eventually need fixing, and boilers have a habit of breaking down (I’ve had the pleasure of that bill this year, and let’s just say it wasn’t the highlight of 2025).

Still, for most investors, the long-term growth easily outweighs these occasional headaches.

Capital growth comparison showing houses significantly outperforming flats over both short and long-term periods

What About Flats

Flats, on the other hand, tell a different story. They’re often the more affordable entry point into the property market (great if your trying to get a property in the city center).

For an investor with limited capital, this lower price tag opens doors. It’s also easier to spread your money across more than one property, reducing risk if a tenant moves out.

Flats appeal strongly to singles, young professionals, and couples, especially in city centers where the rental demand rarely sleeps.

But with flats come the inevitable service charges and ground rents, which eat into your returns.

And while flats can deliver strong yields in urban markets, they typically lag behind houses when it comes to long-term appreciation.

Still, for investors chasing steady rental demand and faster portfolio growth, flats can be a smart play.

Rental yield comparison showing flats typically offering higher yields than houses across regions

Case Study: Investing £40k

So lets take a look at this case study.

Imagine you’ve got £40,000 set aside as your deposit. With a 75% loan-to-value mortgage, you’ve got options—but the strategy you choose will completely change the kind of portfolio you build.

Option 1: Two City-Centre Flats in Manchester

With £40k, you could split your deposit across two smaller flats priced around £120,000 each in Manchester city center.

  • Deposit per flat: £30,000 (mortgage £90,000)

  • Rental Income per flat: ~£800 per month (young professional tenants).

  • Total Monthly Rent: ~£1,600.

  • Costs: Service charges and ground rents of around £100–£150 per flat.

  • Tenant Demand: High—these properties appeal to graduates, professionals, and couples who want to live in the heart of the city, close to transport and nightlife.

Here you’re doubling your exposure, diversifying your risk (if one tenant moves out, you still have the other paying), and benefiting from the constant demand for city living. The downside? Those pesky service charges eat into your yield, and long-term capital growth tends to be slower for flats.

Option 2: One House Outside the City Centre

The same £40k could instead be used as a deposit on a £160,000 family house in Greater Manchester, slightly outside the buzz of the city center.

  • Deposit: £40,000 (mortgage £120,000)

  • Rental Income: ~£950 per month (family tenant).

  • Costs: Maintenance, insurance, but no service charges or ground rent.

  • Tenant Demand: More stable—families tend to stay put longer, meaning fewer voids and lower turnover.

Here you’ve only got one tenant and one income stream, but you’ve also got a freehold property with strong capital appreciation potential.

Over 10 years, the land value could make this a far more valuable asset than flats.

The yield looks slightly weaker here once you account for service charges, but it may still appeal if you’re targeting urban areas with consistent rental demand.

The Real Difference

This is where the strategy question bites.

  • With flats, you’re in the heart of Manchester—higher tenant demand, strong short-term income, and diversification across two properties.

  • With a house, you’re slightly out of town—lower cash flow, but better capital growth potential and fewer ongoing costs.

Both can work brilliantly—but they deliver different kinds of wealth.

Property Listing

Pacific Way, Derby

Detail

Value

Price of property

£115,000

Beds/Baths

2/1

Deposit (25% of property price)

£28,750

Expected Monthly Income

£825

Expected Monthly Expenses

£573.75

Expected Monthly Cash Flow

£251.25

Expected ROI

8.89%

Dexter Street, Derby

Detail

Value

Price of property

£130,000

Beds/Baths

2/1

Deposit (25% of property price)

£32,500

Expected Monthly Income

£850

Expected Monthly Expenses

£440.00

Expected Monthly Cash Flow

£410.00

Expected ROI

12.87%


Swinburne Street, Derby

Detail

Value

Price of property

£80,000

Beds/Baths

2/1

Deposit (25% of property price)

£20,000

Expected Monthly Income

£850

Expected Monthly Expenses

£442.50

Expected Monthly Cash Flow

£407.50

Expected ROI

20.28%

Bottom Line

The choice really comes down to what you want out of your portfolio.

If your heart is set on building wealth steadily over the years and benefiting from the compounding effect of capital growth, a house will almost always be the better bet.

But if your goal is to get cash flow working for you quickly and to diversify across multiple properties, flats can be a powerful tool.

The truth is, many successful investors end up with a mix: houses that grow in value and flats that keep the cash flowing.

With £100,000, you stand at a crossroads.

Do you want to play the long game and let your money snowball in value, or do you want steady income streams you can bank right away?

That’s the beauty of property investing—there isn’t one right answer, just the right answer for you.

What Next?

Would you put £40k into two flats in Manchester city centre, or one house outside the city? Reply and let me know—I’ll share the results in a future issue.

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Enjoyed this edition?

Share The Data Capital with your friends and follow us on Instagram @thedatacapital on Instagram.

Reply

or to participate.